Your BIM model, checked against our SI library.

Every violation shown in 3D with its exact clause — and every cross-discipline clash with its exact penetration depth — before submission.

One code defect costs everyone dearly.

No commitment — 30 minutes, and you'll walk away with a real picture of your model.

A corridor-width finding in 3D: measured 1,100 mm against SI 1918's required 1,300 mm, with a red dimension arrow at the exact spot.
A stair finding in 3D: a 192 mm riser flagged red against a 175 mm limit.
An MEP clash in 3D: duct through wall, 150 mm penetration.
A vertical-order finding in 3D between a fire-sprinkler and an electrical conduit: 26.6 mm, requires installation below the cables plus a minimum 50 mm gap — flagged for verification.

Four real findings from the live engine — accessibility, stairs, coordination, and separation — each with the exact measurement and clause. The interface is in Hebrew.

17 real international models·83/83 Israeli Standard (SI) clauses verified·Our standardzero false positives

Built by a registered structural engineer, in-house, with guidance from architecture & engineering advisors from the industry.

Dozens of codes. Thousands of clauses. A miss isn't a glitch — it's a statistical certainty.

Still checked by hand across fragmented consultant silos. A defect caught late forces months of delay, crushing holding costs, and rework — sometimes demolition and rebuild.

A full-model report — in minutes, not weeks of manual review.

§ What you get

Five capabilities, one model.

Standards compliance check Clash detection · ARC/STR/MEP Automated quantities (BoQ) BCF export — open standard Remediation options + cost

§ How it reads

The engine scans your whole model — floor by floor.

Every element, every discipline, against the encoded building code. Compliant surfaces clear; a real violation lights up with its exact clause. No sampling, no guesswork.

The engine applies the Israeli code to any IFC model, from any tool or country — validated on 17 real, multi-discipline international models (Revit, ArchiCAD, Vectorworks, MagiCAD). Real Israeli project models come with the first pilots.

For every violation, the engine also proposes a remediation cost estimate and exports a standard BCF file — an open coordination format that replaces back-and-forth screenshots and spreadsheets between consultants; everyone fixes the model in their own source tool.

§ The product

Every finding, shown on the model.

Every result — both ✗ and ✓ — is measured with the same rigor.

TofesBIM · 3D
A door measured at 2.04 m in 3D, passing the 1.98 m requirement, marked with a green arrow.
SI 1918 · doors

Measured, not declared.

Clear height 2.04 m on the opening itself — above the 1.98 m SI 1918 requirement, and marked green.

TofesBIM · 3D
A guardrail in 3D measured at 1,092 mm from the walking surface, passing the 900 mm requirement, with a green arrow.
SI 1142 · guardrails

And what passes, passes honestly.

Guardrail 1,092 mm, measured geometrically from the walking surface — clear, and marked green.

TofesBIM · 3D
A stair measured at 1,300 mm wide in 3D, passing the 1,100 mm requirement, marked with a green arrow.
stairs · width

A real margin, not a borderline one.

1,300 mm against a 1,100 mm requirement — not a narrow pass, comfortably clear, with the measurement drawn straight across the tread.

§ Who it's for

Built for everyone a code defect costs dearly.

Architecture firms Developers MEP & structural engineers Accessibility consultants Fire-safety consultants Shelter-room (Mamad) consultants General contractors Design-control institutes

Our standard: FAIL only at 100% certainty.

Clause, geometric measurement, unambiguous attribution — anything less is an honest "verify". Because one false alarm burns the trust of the person who signs. 83/83 clauses verified against the official source — and guarded by 3,000+ automated tests.

Two paths

Every building in Israel needs a permit — through one of two paths, and in both, one code defect gets expensive.

Self-permitting reform

the fast track · since 2024

The architect approves the plan directly and can get a permit within months — but as the plan's primary filer, must coordinate every consultant's requirement into the model. We prevent those contradictions before submission.

The committee route

the regular track

The process can run for years, with every defect bouncing between architect, consultants and committee. We arrive at the committee with a file that passes.

Either path — we're the net that catches it before it falls.

Why now

Israel's self-permitting reform lets architects issue permits directly — shifting sole liability for code compliance onto the architect and their consultants. Extended to multi-family housing in 2026; ~77K units were permitted in 2024 (CBS).

"Getting a permit in Israel currently takes almost three years on average, and an architect who is also a licensed submitter can issue a building permit in just a few months."

— Asaf Ashrov, chair of the Tel Aviv district, Israeli Association of Architects, in an interview with Ynet

Code compliance just went from nice-to-have to non-negotiable.

The moat

Revit and Navisworks do geometric clash only; the global consolidators chase cloud coordination — none localize to national codes. That's the Jurisdictional Moat: architecture is global, regulation is always local.

The engine is running. Give it a model.

Book a 30-minute demo — I'll run TofesBIM on your model, live. Now securing our first Israeli pilot partners: architecture firms, their consultants, and contractors.

Matan Luzon · Founder & Civil Engineer (B.Sc)